Love and Justice: a Paradox?

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (6):739-759 (2017)

Abstract

Three claims about love and justice cannot be simultaneously true and therefore entail a paradox: (1) Love is a matter of justice. (2) There cannot be a duty to love. (3) All matters of justice are matters of duty. The first claim is more controversial. To defend it, I show why the extent to which we enjoy the good of love is relevant to distributive justice. To defend (2) I explain the empirical, conceptual and axiological arguments in its favour. Although (3) is the most generally endorsed claim of the three, I conclude we should reject it in order to avoid the paradox.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,722

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-26

Downloads
334 (#32,360)

6 months
4 (#163,019)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Promises.Allen Habib - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Homophobes, Racists, and the Child’s Right to Be Loved Unconditionally.Riccardo Spotorno - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-24.
Jugend, romantische Liebe und das gute Leben.Gottfried Schweiger - 2021 - Zeitschrift Für Ethik Und Moralphilosophie 4 (1):41-66.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Seeing Through the Fog: Love and Injustice in "Bleak House".Joyce Kloc McClure - 2003 - Journal of Religious Ethics 31 (1):23 - 44.
Seeing Through the Fog: Love and Injustice in Bleak House.Joyce Kloc McClure - 2003 - Journal of Religious Ethics 31 (1):23-44.
Wolterstorff on Love and Justice. [REVIEW]Joseph Clair - 2013 - Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (1):138-167.
Distributive Justice as a Matter of Love: A Relational Approach to Liberty and Property.Thaddeus Metz - 2019 - In Ingolf Dalferth & Trevor Kimball (eds.), Love and Justice. Mohr Siebeck. pp. 339-352.
Loving Justice, Living Shakespeare.Regina Mara Schwartz - 2016 - Oxford University Press UK.
Just Love? Marriage and the Question of Justice.Pauline Kleingeld - 1998 - Social Theory and Practice 24 (2):261-281.
Christian Love and Covenant Faithfulness.William Werpehowski - 1991 - Journal of Religious Ethics 19 (2):103 - 132.
On a Paradox of Christian Love.Qingping Liu - 2007 - Journal of Religious Ethics 35 (4):681-694.