Tania Gergel, Preety Das, Lucy Stephenson, Gareth Owen, Larry Rifkin, John Dawson, Alex Ruck Keene & Guy Hindley
The Lancet Psychiatry 8 (2021)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Summary
Background Self-binding directives instruct clinicians to overrule treatment refusal during future severe episodes of illness. These directives are promoted as having potential to increase autonomy for individuals with severe episodic mental illness. Although lived experience is central to their creation, service users’ views on self-binding directives have not been investigated substantially. This study aimed to explore whether reasons for endorsement, ambivalence, or rejection given by service users with bipolar disorder can address concerns regarding self-binding directives, decision-making capacity, and human rights.
Methods This study used qualitative data from an internet-based survey distributed to the mailing list of the UK charity Bipolar UK, which contained multiple closed and open questions on advance decision-making in bipolar disorder. Quantitative analysis of a closed question about self-binding directives had already demonstrated endorsement amongst a very high proportion of participants with bipolar disorder who completed the survey. We conducted thematic analysis of responses from those participants who answered a subsequent open question about reasons for their view. Research was co-produced within a multi-disciplinary team, with clinical, legal, and ethical expertise, and lived experience of bipolar disorder. Ideas and methodologies associated with all these areas of expertise were used in the analysis of these reasons and to gain insight into the thoughts of individuals with bipolar disorder about self-binding directives and associated issues.
Findings Between Oct 23 and Dec 5, 2017, 932 individuals with a self-reported clinical diagnosis of bipolar disorder completed the internet survey, with 565 (154 men; 400 women; 11 transgender or other) providing free text answers to the open question. A large majority of respondents endorsed self-binding directives, nearly all describing a determinate shift to types of distorted thinking and decision-making when unwell as their key justification. Responses indicating ambivalence were dominated by logistical concerns about the drafting and implementation of self-binding directives, while those who rejected self-binding directives also cited logistical concerns, validity of their thinking when unwell, and potential contravention of human rights.
Interpretation This study is, to our knowledge, the first large study of reasons why mental health service users might endorse or reject the use of self-binding directives. The findings provide empirical support for introducing self-binding directives into mental health advance decision-making practice and policy and may help to address enduring ethical concerns surrounding possible implementation of the directive while a person retains decision-making capacity. The opinions expressed here in responses given by multiple service users with bipolar disorder challenge a prominent view within international disability rights debates that involuntary treatment and recognition of impaired mental capacity constitute inherent human rights violations.
Funding The Wellcome Trust
|
Keywords | advance directives self-binding directives bipolar disorder psychiatry disability rights mental health law |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Fluctuating Capacity and Advanced Decision Making – Self-Binding Directives and Self-Determination’.Tania Gergel & Gareth Owen - 2015 - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 105 (40):92-101.
Are Advance Directives Helpful for Good End of Life Decision Making: A Cross Sectional Survey of Health Professionals.Eimantas Peicius, Aurelija Blazeviciene & Raimondas Kaminskas - 2017 - BMC Medical Ethics 18 (1):40.
Advance Healthcare Directives: Binding or Informational Value?Gianluca Montanari Vergallo - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (1):98-109.
Advance Directives Outside the USA: Are They the Best Solution Everywhere?Miguel A. Sanchez-Conzalez - 1997 - Theoretical Medicine 18 (3):283-301.
Advance Directives Outside the USA: Are They the Best Solution Everywhere?Miguel A. Sanchez-Conzalez - 1997 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 18 (3):283-301.
An Analysis of Common Arguments Against Advance Directives.M. Mitchell - 2012 - Nursing Ethics 19 (2):245-251.
End-of-Life Care in the 21st Century: Advance Directives in Universal Rights Discourse.Violeta Be Irević - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (3):105-112.
A Multigenerational Study on the Correlation of Values and Advance Directives.David J. Doukas, Toni Antonucci & Daniel W. Gorenflo - 1992 - Ethics and Behavior 2 (1):51 – 59.
End‐of‐Life Care in the 21st Century: Advance Directives in Universal Rights Discourse.Violeta Beširević - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (3):105-112.
Factors Influencing Preferences of Korean People Toward Advance Directives.Su Hyun Kim - 2011 - Nursing Ethics 18 (4):505-513.
The Time Frame of Preferences, Dispositions, and the Validity of Advance Directives for the Mentally Ill.Julian Savulescu & Donna Dickenson - 1998 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 5 (3):225-246.
Advance Directives in Turkey's Cultural Context: Examining the Potential Benefits for the Implementation of Patient Rights.Tolga Guven & Gurkan Sert - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (3):127-133.
Autonomy and the Moral Authority of Advance Directives.Eric Vogelstein - 2016 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (5):500-520.
Advance Directives and Older People: Ethical Challenges in the Promotion of Advance Directives in New Zealand.Phillipa J. Malpas - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (5):285-289.
Dementia and Advance Directives: Some Empirical and Normative Concerns.Karin R. Jongsma, Marijke C. Kars & Johannes J. M. van Delden - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (2):92-94.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2021-05-26
Total views
67 ( #169,455 of 2,498,993 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #39,210 of 2,498,993 )
2021-05-26
Total views
67 ( #169,455 of 2,498,993 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #39,210 of 2,498,993 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads