Public scientific testimony in the scientific image

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (C) (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2020

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.05.006

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Epistemic Norms of Intra-Scientific Testimony.Mikkel Gerken - 2015 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (6):568-595.
Expert Trespassing Testimony and the Ethics of Science Communication.Mikkel Gerken - 2018 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 49 (3):299-318.
Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony.Elizabeth Anderson - 2011 - Episteme 8 (2):144-164.
Understanding and Trusting Science.Matthew H. Slater, Joanna K. Huxster & Julia E. Bresticker - 2019 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 50 (2):247-261.
Collaborative Scientific Knowledge and Testimonial Justification.Angella Yamamoto - 2019 - Dissertation, University of Waterloo
Gender and Trust in Science.Kristina Rolin - 2002 - Hypatia 17 (4):95-118.
Gender and trust in science.Kristina Rolin - 2002 - Hypatia 17 (4):95-118.
Liberal naturalism and the scientific image of the world.David Macarthur - 2019 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 62 (5):565-585.
Scientific Consensus and Expert Testimony in Courts: Lessons from the Bendectin Litigation.Boaz Miller - 2016 - Foundations of Science 21 (1):15-33.
Trusting the Scientific Community: The Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Trust in Science.Matthew Slater -
The manifest image ≠ the commonsense conceptual framework (in the philosophy of Wilfrid sellars).Andrew Chrucky - manuscript
Bild in der Wissenschaft.Nicola Mößner - 2016 - Image 23 (1):65-86.
The Kuhnian Image of Science: Time for a Decisive Transformation?Moti Mizrahi (ed.) - 2018 - London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Commentary on “seeds of discontent: Expert opinion, mass media message, and the public image of agricultural biotechnology” (priest and gillespie).Lisa N. Geller - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):541-542.
Science, technology and democracy: Perspectives about the complex relation between the scientific community, the scientific journalist and public opinion.Antonio López Peláez & José Antonio Díaz - 2007 - Social Epistemology 21 (1):55 – 68.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-15

Downloads
74 (#218,358)

6 months
9 (#298,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mikkel Gerken
University of Southern Denmark

Citations of this work

What Is the Function of Confirmation Bias?Uwe Peters - 2022 - Erkenntnis 87 (3):1351-1376.
Science Communication and the Problematic Impact of Descriptive Norms.Uwe Peters - 2023 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 74 (3):713-738.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Experts: Which ones should you trust?Alvin I. Goldman - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1):85-110.
What Is Epistemic Public Trust in Science?Gürol Irzık & Faik Kurtulmuş - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 70 (4):1145-1166.
Epistemic Trust in Science.Torsten Wilholt - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (2):233-253.
Values and Uncertainties in the Predictions of Global Climate Models.Eric Winsberg - 2012 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 22 (2):111-137.

View all 18 references / Add more references