Moral judgments in narrative contexts

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):550-550 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In narrative contexts, people often find themselves mentally rooting for “bad guys.” These circumstances lead to questions about how Sunstein's moral heuristics function during narrative experiences. In particular, must people undertake explicit moral analysis for the heuristics to apply?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On moral intuitions and moral heuristics: A response.Cass R. Sunstein - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):565-570.
Towards an intuitionist account of moral development.Karen Bartsch & Jennifer Cole Wright - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):546-547.
Cognitivism, controversy, and moral heuristics.Matthew D. Adler - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):542-543.
Narrative, Morality and Religion.J. Wesley Robbins - 1980 - Journal of Religious Ethics 8 (1):161 - 176.
Regulation of risks.Paul Weirich - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):564-565.
Betrayal aversion is reasonable.Jonathan J. Koehler & Andrew D. Gershoff - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):556-557.
Subjectivity and the limits of narrative.Joseph Neisser - 2008 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (2):51-66.
Moral heuristics.Cass R. Sunstein - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):531-542.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
48 (#324,723)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references