Values, value types and moral reasoning of MBA students

Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 19 (2):183-198 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study uses the Schwartz Values Questionnaire and version 2 of the Defining Issues Test to investigate the values, value types and level of moral reasoning of a sample of 108 MBA students in a Canadian university. There are no statistically significant differences in the levels of moral reasoning attributed to gender. Male and female MBA students rank ‘family security’ and ‘healthy’ as their two most important values. For males, hedonism, achievement and self‐direction are the three most important value types, while for females they are benevolence, hedonism and security, respectively. There are statistically significant gender differences for the value types hedonism, achievement, stimulation and power. Overall, however, there are more similarities than differences between the male and the female students. Regression analysis indicates a statistically significant positive association between the postconventional level of moral reasoning as measured by P‐scores and the value‐type universalism. The findings provide further evidence that value types affect the postconventional level of moral reasoning

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Values, value types and moral reasoning of mba students.George Lan, Maureen Gowing, Fritz Rieger, Sharon McMahon & Norman King - 2010 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 19 (2):183-198.
A Comparison of Value Conflicts Between Students and Workers.Anita Leffel & James Lackey - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:57-60.
Intuition versus Reason: Strategies People Use to Think About Moral Problems.Mark Fedyk & Barbara Koslowski - 2013 - Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
So We Teach Business Ethics—Do They Learn?Aaron A. Buchko & Kathleen J. Buchko - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 6:119-146.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
5 (#1,469,565)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references