Rooks received

American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 73 (4) (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

D. H. LAwrence and Michael Polanyi.Pamela A. Rooks - 1987 - Tradition and Discovery 15 (2):20-26.
On a Straw Man in the Philosophy of Science - A Defense of the Received View.Sebastian Lutz - 2012 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2 (1):77–120.
What’s Wrong with the Received View of Evolutionary Theory?John Beatty - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:397 - 426.
In defense of the received view.Steffen Borge - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (6):863 - 887.
Empirical Adequacy in the Received View.Sebastian Lutz - 2014 - Philosophy of Science 81 (5):1171-1183.
Are Virtual Quanta Nothing but Formal Tools?Mario Bacelar Valente - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):39 - 53.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-22

Downloads
32 (#431,931)

6 months
1 (#1,042,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

N. W. Law
Hong Kong Baptist University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references