Ontological and ethical implications of direct nuclear reprogramming: Response to Magill and neaves

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (1):pp. 33-40 (2009)

Abstract

The paper by Magill and Neaves in this issue of the Journal attempts to rebut the "natural potency" position, based on recent advances in direct reprogramming of somatic cells to yield "induced pluripotent stem" (iPS) cells. As stated by the authors, the natural potency position holds that because "a human embryo directs its own integral organismic function from its beginning . . . there is a whole, albeit immature, and distinct human organism that is intrinsically valuable with the status of inviolability and deserving full moral respect" (p. 26). The authors boldly assert that "The recent production of iPS . . . highlights a prima facie absurdity for the natural potentiality argument" (p. 29). Yet the argument against natural potency is both logically flawed and based on a characterization of the scientific evidence that is factually inaccurate.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,879

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-03-11

Downloads
50 (#230,860)

6 months
3 (#197,582)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Robert George
Durham University
Patrick Lee
Franciscan University of Steubenville

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references