Oxford University Press (1993)
AbstractContemporary liberal thinkers commonly suppose that there is something in principle unjust about the legal prohibition of putatively victimless crimes. Here Robert P. George defends the traditional justification of morals legislation against criticisms advanced by leading liberal theorists. He argues that such legislation can play a legitimate role in maintaining a moral environment conducive to virtue and inhospitable to at least some forms of vice. Among the liberal critics of morals legislation whose views George considers are Ronald Dworkin, Jeremy Waldron, David A.J. Richards, and Joseph Raz. He also considers the influential modern justification for morals legislation offered by Patrick Devlin as an alternative to the traditional approach. George closes with a sketch of a "pluralistic perfectionist" theory of civil liberties and public morality, showing that it is fully compatible with a defense of morals legislation. Making Men Moral will interest legal scholars and political theorists as well as theologians and philosophers focusing on questions of social justice and political morality.
Similar books and articles
Common law approaches to the relationship between law and morality.Roger Cotterrell - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (1):9-26.
Book Reviews : Making Men Moral: civil liberties and public morality, by Robert P. George. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1993. 241pp. 15.99. [REVIEW]Keith Pavlischek - 1996 - Studies in Christian Ethics 9 (2):87-89.
R. P. George, Making Men Moral: Civil Liberties and Public Morality, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1993, pp. xvi + 241. [REVIEW]Andrew Mason - 1995 - Utilitas 7 (1):175.
Civil ethics and the validity of law.Adela Cortina - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (1):39-55.
Moral autonomy, civil liberties, and confucianism.Joseph Chan - 2002 - Philosophy East and West 52 (3):281-310.
Review essay / perfectionist moral theory, the criminal law, and the liberal state.David A. J. Richards - 1994 - Criminal Justice Ethics 13 (2):93-101.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Justifying Limitations on the Freedom of Expression.Gehan Gunatilleke - 2021 - Human Rights Review 22 (1):91-108.
New Legal Moralism: Some Strengths and Challenges.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (2):215-232.
Virtue jurisprudence a virtue–centred theory of judging.Lawrence B. Solum - 2003 - Metaphilosophy 34 (1/2):178--213.
The liberal critique of the harm principle.Donald A. Dripps - 1998 - Criminal Justice Ethics 17 (2):3-18.
References found in this work
No references found.