Chapter 11 and asbestos: Encouraging private enterprise or conspiring to avoid liability? [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 55 (1):31-42 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores the American bankruptcy system -- especially the Chapter 11 code -- which since 1978 has allowed insolvent companies the opportunity to restructure and reorganise with the benefit of court protection from creditors. Particular attention is focused on asbestos companies, such as Johns--Manville, which have been among the most consistent and controversial filers for bankruptcy under Chapter 11. The history of asbestos and Chapter 11 is explored, against the backdrop of the burgeoning asbestos crisis, caused by increasing mortality and litigation. Some of the business and ethical issues involved are highlighted by examining in detail a recent bankruptcy (Federal Mogul/T&N in 2001) that has implications in both Britain and America. Chapter 11 bankruptcy is evaluated, particularly in the light of the trend towards similar mechanisms of insolvency in the UK, Europe and the rest of the world. It is concluded that, certainly as regards the experience with asbestos, Chapter 11 offers an inefficient and inequitable method of rehabilitating or rescuing failing businesses.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
48 (#324,723)

6 months
9 (#295,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Ethical Issues that arise in Bankruptcy.Jacques Boettcher, Gerald Cavanagh & Min Xu - 2014 - Business and Society Review 119 (4):473-496.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Shopping.[author unknown] - 2010
.M. E. Warren - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 6 references / Add more references