In Keith Augustine & Michael Martin (eds.), The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life After Death. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 105-133 (2015)

Rocco J. Gennaro
University of Southern Indiana
It has long been known that brain damage has important negative effects on one’s mental life and even eliminates one’s ability to have certain conscious experiences. It thus stands to reason that when all of one’s brain activity ceases upon death, consciousness is no longer possible and so neither is an afterlife. It seems clear that human consciousness is dependent upon functioning brains. This essay reviews some of the overall neurological evidence from brain damage studies and concludes that our argument from brain damage has been vindicated by such overwhelming evidence. It also puts forth a more mature philosophical rationale against an afterlife and counters several replies to the argument. 1. Philosophical Background -- 2. The Dependence of Consciousness on the Brain: Some Preliminary Evidence -- 3. Brain Damage, Lesion Studies, and the Localization of Mental Function - 3.1 Perception - 3.2 Awareness, Comprehension, and Recognition - 3.3 Memory - 3.4 Personality - 3.5 Language - 3.6 Emotion - 3.7 Decision-Making - 3.8 Social Cognition and Theory of Mind - 3.9 Moral Judgment and Empathy - 3.10 Neurological Disorders and Disease - 3.11 The Unity of Consciousness -- 4. Objections and Replies - 4.1 Souls, Minds, and Energy Fields - 4.2 The Instrument Theory - 4.3 The Embodied Soul Alone is Affected -- 5. Conclusion
Keywords brain damage  consciousness  afterlife  death  mind-body problem  dualism  materialism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Naming and Necessity.S. Kripke - 1972 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (4):665-666.
What Mary Didn't Know.Frank Jackson - 1986 - Journal of Philosophy 83 (5):291-295.
Zombies and Consciousness.Robert Kirk (ed.) - 2005 - Oxford University Press UK.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Evidence or Prejudice? A Reply to Matlock. [REVIEW]Keith Augustine - 2016 - Journal of Parapsychology 80:203-231.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Does Electroconvulsive Therapy Cause Brain Damage?Richard D. Weiner - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (1):1-22.
Overall Intelligence and Localized Brain Damage.Dahlia W. Zaidel - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (2):173-174.
Brain Damage and the Moral Significance of Consciousness.Julian Savulescu - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (1):6-26.
Dissociating Components in Conscious Experience.Luis J. Fuentes - 2000 - European Psychologist 5 (1):13-15.
Double Dissociation in the Effects of Brain Damage on Working Memory.Rolf Verleger - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):758-759.
Pathological Completion: The Blind Leading the Mind?Robin Walker & Jason B. Mattingley - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):778-779.


Added to PP index

Total views
647 ( #12,589 of 2,519,275 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #46,298 of 2,519,275 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes