Pupil diameter reflects uncertainty in attentional selection during visual search

, , &
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3389/fnhum.2015.00435

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Attentional effects in visual search: Relating search accuracy and search time.John Palmer - 1998 - In Richard D. Wright (ed.), Visual Attention. Oxford University Press. pp. 8--348.
Selection, inspection, and naming in visual search.Charles R. Snyder - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 92 (3):428.
Binocular rivalry and the cerebral hemispheres, with a note on the correlates and constitution of visual consciousness.S. M. Miller - 2001 - Brain and Mind 2 (1):119-49.
Subjective discriminability of invisibility: A framework for distinguishing perceptual and attentional failures of awareness.Ryota Kanai, Vincent Walsh & Chia-Huei Tseng - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (4):1045-1057.
The attentional capacity of visual search under flicker conditions.Ronald A. Rensink - 1996 - In Enrique Villanueva (ed.), Perception. Ridgeview. pp. 25--2.
Visual search for change: A probe into the nature of attentional processing.Ronald A. Rensink - 2000 - Visual Cognition 7:345-376.
Binocular rivalry and the cerebral hemispheres.Steven M. Miller - 2001 - Brain and Mind 2:119-149.
Visual-attention shifts and response selection queuing-distinct attentional mechanisms.H. Pashler - 1989 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27 (6):530-530.
Hemispheric laterality measured in Rembrandt's portraits using pupil diameter and aesthetic verbal judgements.W. Ryan Powell & James A. Schirillo - 2011 - Cognition and Emotion 25 (5):868-885.
Inter-trial priming does not affect attentional priority in asymmetric visual search.Liana Amunts, Amit Yashar & Dominique Lamy - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
Machine Learning to Differentiate Between Positive and Negative Emotions Using Pupil Diameter.Areej Babiker, Ibrahima Faye, Kristin Prehn & Aamir Malik - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.Derrick G. Watson & Glyn W. Humphreys - 1997 - Psychological Review 104 (1):90-122.
Visual processing capacity and attentional control.Richard M. Shiffrin & Gerald T. Gardner - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (1):72.
Response selection and visual search.Murray J. White - 1981 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 18 (4):201-202.
Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.Edward Awh, Artem V. Belopolsky & Jan Theeuwes - 2012 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (8):437.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
19 (#775,535)

6 months
13 (#185,110)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Attention and Effort.Daniel Kahneman - 1973 - Prentice-Hall.
An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function.Earl K. Miller & Jonathan D. Cohen - 2001 - Annual Review of Neuroscience 24 (1):167-202.
Visual search and stimulus similar¬ity.John Duncan & Glyn W. Humphreys - 1989 - Psychological Review 96 (3):433-458.
The attention system of the human brain.Michael I. Posner & Steven E. Petersen - 1990 - Annual Review of Neuroscience 13:25-42.

View all 6 references / Add more references