- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Logic: Analyzing and Appraising Arguments
Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall (1989)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Introduction: Arguing about arguments, analyzing analysis.Matti Häyry [ - 2010 - In Matti Häyry (ed.), Arguments and Analysis in Bioethics. Rodopi.
Toulmin's Informal Logic as a Bridge Between Political Theory and Policy Analysis.William J. Ball - 1992 - Dissertation, University of Missouri - Columbia
Analyzing Conversational Reasoning.Merrilee H. Salmon & Colleen M. Zeitz - 1995 - Informal Logic 17 (1).
Can we translate sounds into words? A response to Leo Groarke`'s "Auditory Arguments: The Logic of ‘Sound’ Arguments".Gabrijela Kisicek - 2018 - Informal Logic 38 (3):346-361.
On analyzing the standards of forensic evidence: A reply to Schoeman.L. Jonathan Cohen - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (1):92-97.
Understanding arguments.Donald Evans - 1986 - Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Distributed in the U.S.A. and Canada by Humanities Press. Edited by Humphrey Palmer.
The 'Most Important and Fundamental' Distinction in Logic.G. C. Goddu - 2002 - Informal Logic 22 (1).
The logic of questions as a theory of erotetic arguments.Andrzej Wiśniewski - 1996 - Synthese 109 (1):1 - 25.
In defense of the law of noncontradiction.Edward N. Zalta - 2004 - In J. C. Beall, B. Armour-Garb & G. Priest (eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction : New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-11-17
Downloads
2 (#1,755,150)
6 months
1 (#1,459,555)
2021-11-17
Downloads
2 (#1,755,150)
6 months
1 (#1,459,555)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo