Is the self of social behaviorism capable of auto-affection? Mead and Marion on the "I" and the "me"
Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (2):242-265 (2006)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
: The purpose of this manuscript is to bring Mead's pragmatism into contact with Jean-Luc Marion's phenomenology. Taking as its focus the question of the I-pole of the self, the paper points to the absence and the need of a concept like auto-affection in Mead's analysis of selfhood. A pragmatic appropriation of this concept does not undermine the social framework of selfhood because the most rudimentary self-givenness is immediate and direct, yet simultaneously a posteriori. The social and biological genesis of mind, self and society reserves a prominent place for auto-affection, which liberates the self from his estrangement within the horizon of objecthood by acknowledging a multiplicity of types of self-givenness besides that of self-objectification
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.2979/TRA.2006.42.2.242 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
G.H. Mead's Understanding of the Nature of Speech in the Light of Contemporary Research.Timothy J. Gallagher - 2012 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (1):40-62.
The Social Nature of Self and Morality for Husserl, Schutz, Marx, and Mead.William M. O’Meara - 1986 - Philosophy Research Archives 12:329-355.
Mead, Intersubjectivity, and Education: The Early Writings. [REVIEW]Gert J. J. Biesta - 1998 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 17 (2/3):73-99.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
124 ( #94,329 of 2,507,555 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,983 of 2,507,555 )
2009-01-28
Total views
124 ( #94,329 of 2,507,555 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,983 of 2,507,555 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads