From Shareholders to Stakeholders: Portraying an Ambiguous Corporation

In Arnaud Sales (ed.), Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Change: Institutional and Organizational Perspectives. Springer Verlag. pp. 61-76 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The social responsibility literature generally agrees on the necessity for a renewal of economic theory to understand social and ecological issues faced by the firm. In this chapter, we analyse some features of the dominant economic conceptualizations of the firm, showing that their representations of the firm are hardly compatible with social responsibility theories. But those theories do not provide a unified alternative conceptualization of the firm able to challenge the dominant economic perspective. Moreover, their representations often remain confined to an organizational level unable to grasp today’s transformations and challenges. Here, we draw upon early analyses of the modern corporation to propose a conceptualization of the firm as a social institution. Such a definition enhances the social and historical construction processes of the corporate form, but also its changing nature with regard to social and economic conflicts and challenges of a particular time. It also opens the debate about the legal framing of what has become a major structuring institution, and its relevance and effectiveness in light of current challenges of our societies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Do shareholders have obligations to stakeholders?Earl W. Spurgin - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 33 (4):287 - 297.
Do Shareholders Have Obligations to Stakeholders?Earl W. Spurgin - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 33 (4):287-297.
Quel avenir pour la gestion des parties prenantes?John Boatright - 2006 - Les Ateliers de L’Ethique 1 (1):42-57.
Corporate responsibility: The stakeholder paradox reconsidered. [REVIEW]Karsten Klint Jensen - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (6):515-532.
The Morality of the Corporation.Ian Maitland - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):445-458.
The Morality of the Corporation.Ian Maitland - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):445-458.
The Benefit Corporation and Corporate Social Responsibility.Janine S. Hiller - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 118 (2):287-301.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-11

Downloads
4 (#1,517,814)

6 months
2 (#1,015,942)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references