Authors
Jyl Gentzler
Amherst College
Abstract
We simply cannot make sense of Socrates' procedure for cross-examining his interlocutors in the early dialogues if we insist that Socrates uses cross-examination only for the purpose of testing his interlocutor's claim to knowledge. This view of Socratic cross-examination cannot explain the fact that Socrates examines theses that he himself proposes and that neither he nor his interlocutor explicitly endorses. In contrast,the supposition that Socrates is inquiring on these occasions provides a good explanation for his procedure. When one is attempting to gain true belief and knowledge, it is important to consider the cases that can be made for hypotheses that one has never before considered, much less believed to be true.
Keywords elenchus  theory of recollection  inquiry
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/2213441794x00148
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Meno's Paradox in Context.David Ebrey - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (1):4-24.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Colloquium 4.Robert Bolton - 1997 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 13 (1):113-138.
Colloquium 6.Nicholas D. Smith - 1997 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 13 (1):187-204.
Colloquium 7.Malcolm Schofield - 1997 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 13 (1):213-241.
Colloquium 2.Gareth B. Matthews - 1997 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 13 (1):35-55.
Colloquium 8.Julius Moravcsik - 1997 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 13 (1):255-275.
Colloquium 7.Mary Louise Gill - 1991 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 7 (1):262-269.
Colloquium 3.John M. Cooper - 1997 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 13 (1):71-104.
Colloquium 5.Thomas M. Tuozzo - 1991 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 7 (1):182-191.
Colloquium 1.Monique Dixsaut - 1997 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 13 (1):xix-27.
Colloquium 4.Jaap Mansfeld - 1991 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 7 (1):107-145.
Colloquium 3.Elizabeth Asmis - 1991 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 7 (1):63-94.
Colloquium 5.Luc Brisson - 1997 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 13 (1):147-176.
Colloquium 4.David Sedley - 1991 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 7 (1):146-157.
Colloquium 6.Joseph P. Lawrence - 1991 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 7 (1):215-225.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-26

Total views
890 ( #6,680 of 2,461,870 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
68 ( #11,520 of 2,461,870 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes