Relativism and the Social Sciences

Cambridge University Press (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This volume of essays deals with the problem of relativism, in particular cultural relativism. If our society knows better than other societies, how do we know that it knows better? There is a profound irony in the fact that this self-doubt has become most acute in the one civilisation that has persuaded the rest of the world to emulate it. The claim to cognitive superiority is often restricted, of course, to the limited sphere of natural science and technology; and that immediately raises the second main theme of this volume - the differences between the human and natural sciences. These essays reach towards a new style and mode of enquiry - a mixture of philosophy, history and anthropology - that promises to prove more revealing and fruitful.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Relativism and the Social Sciences.Ernest Gellner - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (3):367-369.
Relativism and the Ontological Turn within Anthropology.Martin Paleček & Mark Risjord - 2013 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (1):3-23.
How must relativism be construed to be coherent?John F. Fox - 1994 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (1):55-75.
Two kinds of moral relativism.John J. Tilley - 1995 - Journal of Value Inquiry 29 (2):187-192.
Relativism, and Social Theory.".On Relativity - 1986 - In Joseph Margolis, Michael Krausz & Richard M. Burian (eds.), Rationality, Relativism, and the Human Sciences. M. Nijhoff. pp. 209--22.
On Relativity, Relativism, and Social Theory.Braulio Muñoz - 1986 - In Joseph Margolis, Michael Krausz & Richard M. Burian (eds.), Rationality, Relativism, and the Human Sciences. M. Nijhoff. pp. 209--222.
Review of Ernest Gellner: Relativism and the Social Sciences[REVIEW]S. Körner - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (3):367-369.
Ethical relativism.John Ladd - 1973 - Belmont, Calif.,: Wadsworth Pub. Co..
An Approach to Relativism.Thomas L. Carson - 1999 - Teaching Philosophy 22 (2):161-184.
Scepticism, relativism and the argument from the criterion.Howard Sankey - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):182-190.
Moral Relativism: A Reader.Paul K. Moser (ed.) - 2000 - New York, NY: Oup Usa.
Gellner on relativism in the social sciences.Hugh V. McLachlan - 1988 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 18 (1):113-117.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-10

Downloads
17 (#846,424)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Truth and Consequences: When Is It Rational to Accept Falsehoods?Taner Edis & Maarten Boudry - 2019 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 19 (1-2):147-169.
Relativism, reality and philosophy.John Horton - 2000 - History of the Human Sciences 13 (1):19-36.
Is secularism history?Gregor McLennan - 2015 - Thesis Eleven 128 (1):126-140.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references