Mathematical Rigor in Physics: Putting Exact Results in Their Place

Philosophy of Science 72 (5):723-738 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The present paper examines the role of exact results in the theory of many‐body physics, and specifically the example of the Mermin‐Wagner theorem, a rigorous result concerning the absence of phase transitions in low‐dimensional systems. While the theorem has been shown to hold for a wide range of many‐body models, it is frequently ‘violated’ by results derived from the same models using numerical techniques. This raises the question of how scientists regulate their theoretical commitments in such cases, given that the models, too, are often described as approximations to the underlying ‘full’ many‐body problem.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
125 (#138,856)

6 months
13 (#147,845)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Axel Gelfert
Technische Universität Berlin

References found in this work

Explaining the emergence of cooperative phenomena.Chuang Liu - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):106.
Inconsistency and scientific reasoning.Joel M. Smith - 1988 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 19 (4):429-445.
Inconsistency and scientific reasoning.Joel M. Smith - 1988 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 19 (4):429-445.
How to be realistic about inconsistency in science.Bryson Brown - 1990 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (2):281-294.

View all 6 references / Add more references