The Ambiguity of the Term 'Culture' and its Consequences for the Protection of Human Rights

The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:33-36 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The term 'culture' has more than one meaning in different contexts. The paper attempts to show certain consequences, resulting from the ambiguous use of the term 'culture', for the protection of human rights, by comparing the use of the term in the Declaration of the Principles of International Cultural Cooperation (UNESCO 1966), with its use in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. It examines the meanings of the term 'culture' used in the UNESCO Declaration and the impact of this understanding on the protection of the relevant right or rights.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Ambiguity of the Term 'Culture' and its Consequences for the Protection of Human Rights.Nermin Gedik - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:33-36.
A Culture of Human Rights and the Right to Culture.Dana Irina - 2011 - Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (2):30-48.
Law, Cosmopolitan Law and the Protection of Human Rights.Sarah Sorial - 2008 - Journal of International Political Theory 4 (2):241-264.
Human Rights in Indian Context.Sivanandam Panneerselvam - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 11:85-91.
Are There Inalienable Rights?John O. Nelson - 1989 - Philosophy 64 (250):519-524.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-15

Downloads
17 (#849,202)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references