On the importance of Karl Christian Friedrich Krause's panentheism

Zygon 48 (2):364-379 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Panentheism is an often-discussed alternative to Classical theism, and almost any discussion of panentheism starts by way of acknowledging Karl Christian Friedrich Krause (1781–1832) as the person who coined the term.1 However, apart from this tribute, Krause's own panentheism is almost completely unknown. In what follows, I first present a brief overview of Krause's life and correct some misconceptions of his work before I turn to the core ideas of Krause's own panentheistic system of philosophy. In brief, Krause elaborates a scientific holism that is anchored in intellectual intuition of the Absolute as the one principle of being and recognition. The task of philosophical speculation consequently is twofold: the analytic-ascending part of philosophy proceeds by way of transcendental reflection and according to Krause enables us to obtain intellectual intuition. The synthetic-descending part of philosophy starts by way of showing that science as a whole is an explication of the original union of the Absolute as apprehended in intellectual intuition. Once this is achieved, Krause argues that the emerging philosophy of science is most adequately referred to as “panentheism” since everything is what it is “in and through” the Absolute, while the Absolute itself is not reducible to anything in particular. I end by showing how to relate Krause's panentheism to recent philosophical discussion

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wissenschaft ist Panentheismus.Benedikt Paul Göcke - 2011 - In Göcke Benedikt Paul & Wasmaier-Sailer Margit (eds.), Idealismus und natürliche Theologie. Verlag Karl Alber.
Models of God.Ted Peters - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (3-4):273-288.
Open Panentheism and Creatio ex nihilo.Philip Clayton - 2008 - Process Studies 37 (1):166-183.
Minjung Messiah and Process Panentheism.Hiheon Kim - 2008 - Process Studies 37 (1):73-91.
Book reviews. [REVIEW]Décio Krause, Eric Schliesser & Hanne Andersen - 2007 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (3):345 – 357.
What Are You Doing? What Am I Doing?Merton S. Krause - 2005 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 25 (2):257-279.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-10-28

Downloads
218 (#89,365)

6 months
23 (#116,291)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Benedikt Paul Göcke
Ruhr-Universität Bochum

Citations of this work

There is no Panentheistic Paradigm.Benedikt Paul Göcke - 2022 - Heythrop Journal 63 (1):49-56.
Naïve Panentheism.Karl Pfeifer - 2020 - In Godehard Brüntrup, Benedikt Paul Göcke & Ludwig Jaskolla (eds.), Panentheism and Panpsychism: Philosophy of Religion Meets Philosophy of Mind. Paderborn: Mentis. pp. 123-138.
Reply to Raphael Latester.Benedikt Paul Göcke - 2014 - Sophia 53 (3):397-400.
A crucial distinctive author contact information.John E. Culp - 2022 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 91 (3):145-159.

Add more citations