Disclosure of genetic information within families: a case report
Clinical Ethics 3 (1):7-10 (2008)
Abstract
There has been much discussion about what, if any, legal and moral duties professionals have to disclose relevant genetic information to the family members of someone with an identified disease predisposing mutation. Here, we present a case report where dissemination of such a genetic test result did not take place within a family. In contrast to previous literature, there appeared to be no deliberate withholding of information, instead distant relatives were unable to communicate relevant information appropriately. When communication was facilitated through the follow-up of a chance remark, the patient was able to avoid planned major surgery, with its attendant morbidity, and her high anxiety levels were much reduced. We believe this case highlights the need for an ongoing debate on how genetic services can best support patients and their families with disclosing relevant genetic information to other family membersDOI
10.1258/ce.2007.007051
My notes
Similar books and articles
Familial Communication of Research Results: A Need to Know?Lee Black & Kelly A. McClellan - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):605-613.
Communication of genetic information within families: The case for familial comity. [REVIEW]Angela Davey, Ainsley Newson & Peter O’Leary - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (3):161-166.
Genetic information: Consumers' right to privacy versus insurance companies' right to know a public opinion survey. [REVIEW]Shaheen Borna & Stephen Avila - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 19 (4):355 - 362.
Are genetic self-tests dangerous? Assessing the commercialization of genetic testing in terms of personal autonomy.Ludvig Beckman - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (5-6):387-398.
Is there a duty to share genetic information?S. Matthew Liao - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):306-309.
Genetic information: Important but not “exceptional”. [REVIEW]Ruth Hannah Wilkinson - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (3):457-472.
What is genetic information, and why is it significant? A contextual, contrastive, approach.Neil C. Manson - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (1):1–16.
Families and genetic testing : the case of Jane and Phyllis from a four-principles perspective.Raanan Gillon - 2005 - In Richard E. Ashcroft (ed.), Case Analysis in Clinical Ethics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 165.
The use of genetic test information in insurance: The argument from indistinguishability reconsidered.V. Launis - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):299-310.
Governance and social information disclosure evidence from the UK.Sepideh Parsa, Reza Kouhy & Christos Tzovas - 2007 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (3):205-222.
Ethical issues in therapy: Therapist self-disclosure of sexual feelings.Craig D. Fisher - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (2):105 – 121.
Property rights in genetic information.Richard A. Spinello - 2004 - Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):29-42.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-08-24
Downloads
23 (#501,990)
6 months
2 (#298,943)
2010-08-24
Downloads
23 (#501,990)
6 months
2 (#298,943)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
The family covenant and genetic testing.David J. Doukas & Jessica W. Berg - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3):2 – 10.
Genetic testing and the family covenant.D. J. Doukas & J. W. Berg - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3):2-10.
Communication of genetic information within families: The case for familial comity. [REVIEW]Angela Davey, Ainsley Newson & Peter O’Leary - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (3):161-166.