Not So Funny: A Deweyan Response

Contemporary Pragmatism 2 (2):85-91 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Humor is part of the "complex all" of human experience, and meanings may be discerned and action evaluated in relation to the risible. Not every evocation of laughter is funny. Life's little jokes on us may teach us to take ourselves less seriously or humble our expectations, as Mary Magada-Ward and Jessica Wahman argue in their respective papers on Charles Peirce and George Santayana. Yet this evaluation of humor in view of its benefits assumes too much, for humor must first be conceived as an object of reflection, in the Deweyan sense, in order to be given more serious consideration

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why 30 Rock Is Not Funny.Josh Gillon - 2011 - Philosophy and Literature 35 (2):320-337.
Human constructions.Michael Frayn - 2009 - The Philosophers' Magazine 47 (47):120-126.
What's a philosopher to do? A Deweyan response.John Teehan - 1994 - Metaphilosophy 25 (4):376-391.
EPR-like “funny business” in the theory of branching space-times.Nuel Belnap - 2002 - In T. Placek & J. Butterfield (eds.), Non-Locality and Modality. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 293--315.
A Response-Dependent Theory of Precedent.Ivo Entchev - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (3):273-290.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
15 (#919,495)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The rejection of humor in western thought.John Morreall - 1989 - Philosophy East and West 39 (3):243-265.
Humor, Sublimity and Incongruity.John Marmysz - 2001 - Consciousness, Literature and the Arts 2 (3).

Add more references