What is Deontology?, Part Two: Reasons to Act Gerald F. Gaus


Part One of this essay considered familiar ways of characterizing deontology, which focus on the notions of the good and the right. Here we will take up alternative approaches, which stress the type of reasons for actions that are generated by deontological theories. Although some of these alternative conceptualizations of deontology also employ a distinction between the good and the right, all mark the basic contrast between deontology and teleology in terms of reasons to act



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Deontology and defeat.Michael Bergmann - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):87-102.
What is deontology? Part two: Reasons to act. [REVIEW]Gerald F. Gaus - 2001 - Journal of Value Inquiry 35 (2):179-193.
What is deontology? Part one: Orthodox views. [REVIEW]Gerald F. Gaus - 2001 - Journal of Value Inquiry 35 (1):27-42.
The practice of medical ethics: A structuralistic approach.William J. Ellos - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (3).
The Demands of Deontology Are Not So Paradoxical.Judith Andre - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:407-410.
On the Paradox of Deontology.William H. Shaw - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:393-406.


Added to PP

68 (#232,014)

6 months
1 (#1,478,435)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gerald Gaus
Last affiliation: University of Arizona

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references