Open Texture and Schematicity as Arguments for Non-referential Semantics

In Klaus Petrus Sarah-Jane Conrad (ed.), Meaning, Context, and Methodology. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 13-30 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Many of the terms of our language, such as “jar”, are open-textured in the sense that their applicability to novel objects is not entirely determined by their past usage. Many others, such as the verbs “use” and “have”, are schematic in the sense that they have only a very general meaning although on any particular occasion of use they denote some more particular relation. The phenomena of open texture and schematicity constitute a sharp challenge to referential semantics, which assumes that every non-logical term has a definite extension. A different, non-referential approach to formal semantics defines truth as relative to a context and defines contexts as built up from exclusively linguistic entities. For any given utterance of a sentence, there will be one of these contexts that pertains to it. In this framework, open texture and schematicity can be understood as consequences of the complex nature of the pertaining relation between contexts and utterances.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

H. L. A. Hart and the "open texture" of language.Brian Bix - 1991 - Law and Philosophy 10 (1):51 - 72.
Referentiality and Matrix Semantics.Grzegorz Malinowski - 2011 - Studia Logica 97 (2):297 - 312.
¿Descripciones definidas referenciales?Pierre Baumann - 2011 - Princípios 18 (29):285-298.
Reference, inference and the semantics of pejoratives.Timothy Williamson - 2009 - In Joseph Almog & Paolo Leonardi (eds.), The Philosophy of David Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 137--159.
Meaning shift and the purity of 'I'.Edison Barrios - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (1):263-288.
Pseudo-referential matrix semantics for propositional logics.Grzegorz Malinowski - 1983 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 12 (3):90-96.
Two contextualist fallacies.Martin Montminy - 2010 - Synthese 173 (3):317 - 333.
Realismo Moral Naturalista: Problemas Semânticos.Rafael Martins - 2010 - Dissertation, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro
Referential Dependencies Between Conflicting Attitudes.Emar Maier - 2017 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 46 (2):141-167.
Systems of substitutional semantics.Daniel Bonevac - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (4):631-656.
Referential and quantificational indefinites.Janet Dean Fodor & Ivan A. Sag - 1982 - Linguistics and Philosophy 5 (3):355 - 398.
Whither Experimental Semantics?Michael Devitt - 2012 - Theoria 27 (1):5-36.


Added to PP

68 (#235,043)

6 months
12 (#200,125)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Gauker
University of Salzburg

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references