Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):687-687 (2002)
AbstractCarruthers labels as “too strong” the thesis that language is necessary for all conceptual thought. Languageless creatures certainly do think, but when we get clear about what is meant by “conceptual thought,” it appears doubtful that conceptual thought is possible without language.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Similar books and articles
You Don't Say: Figurative Language and Thought.Gregory A. Bryant & Raymond W. Gibbs - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):678-679.
Conceptual Dependency as the Language of Thought.Charles E. M. Dunlop - 1990 - Synthese 82 (2):275-96.
Language and Conceptual Development: Words as Essence Placeholders.Fei Xu - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):704-705.
Putting Thoughts to Work: Concepts, Stimulus-Independence and the Generality Constraint.Elisabeth Camp - manuscript
On the Alleged Priority of Thought Over Language.Christopher Gauker - 2007 - In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), John Searle's Philosophy of Language: Force, Meaning, and Mind. Cambridge University Press. pp. 125.