Concepts are not icons

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):127 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Carey speculates that the representations of core cognition are entirely iconic. However this idea is undercut by her contention that core cognition includes concepts such as object and agency, which are employed in thought as predicates. If Carey had taken on board her claim that core cognition is iconic, very different hypotheses might have come into view.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,649

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Origin of Concepts.Susan Carey - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
O pochodzeniu pojęć.Joanna Komorowska-Mach - 2011 - Filozofia Nauki 19 (4).
Concepts and Cognitive Science.Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis - 1999 - In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence (eds.), Concepts: Core Readings. MIT Press. pp. 3-81.
Beyond Substance Concepts in Cognitive Development.Katherine Nelson - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):81-82.
The Plurality of Concepts.Daniel Aaron Weiskopf - 2009 - Synthese 169 (1):145-173.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-26

Downloads
70 (#170,152)

6 months
1 (#419,510)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Gauker
University of Salzburg

Citations of this work

Neurophilosophy of Number.Hourya Benis Sinaceur - 2017 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 31 (1):1-25.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Origin of Concepts.Susan Carey - 2009 - Oxford University Press.

Add more references