A Balanced Epistemological Orientation for the Social Sciences

Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book examines the strengths and weaknesses of four salient epistemological orientations in the field – positivism, relativism, interpretivism, and intersubjectivism – to identify the characteristics of a theoretically-informed epistemology for social science.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sense in Epistemology of Social Science.Greg Yudin - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 46:109-115.
Historical epistemology and the fate of theory of knowledge in philosophy.Zinaida Sokuler - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 52 (2):29-33.
Knowledge and the social sciences: theory, method, practice.David Goldblatt (ed.) - 2000 - New York: Routledge, in association with Open University.
Epistemology and the sociology of knowledge.Charles Kurzman - 1994 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (3):267-290.
How Is Epistemology Possible?Alina Motycka - 2008 - Dialogue and Universalism 18 (1-3):101-105.
On the Epistemology of the Inexact Sciences. [REVIEW]K. B. L. - 1959 - Review of Metaphysics 13 (1):188-188.
Ideology, Empirical Sciences, and Modern Philosophical Systems.J. C. Akike Agbakoba - 2005 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 4 (10):116-125.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-31

Downloads
4 (#1,517,814)

6 months
3 (#760,965)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references