The theory of natural beauty and its evil star: Kant, Hegel, Adorno

Research in Phenomenology 32 (1):103-122 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the aftermath of Kant, that is, with Schelling and Hegel, the natural beautiful is no longer a major concern of aesthetic theory. According to Adorno, an evil star hangs over the theory of natural beauty. The essay examines the reasons for this neglect of the beautiful of nature by confronting Kant's account of natural beauty with Hegel's theory about the fundamental deficiencies of beauty in nature and locates them in the essential indeterminacy of everything that belongs to nature. Inquiring into what Adorno seeks to achieve by playing Kant and Hegel off against one another, it is shown that this indeterminacy of nature is both an index of nature's interconnectedness with mythical violence and the promise of a freedom from myth.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
151 (#120,431)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Adorno and the disenchantment of nature.Alison Stone - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (2):231-253.
Adorno and Schelling on the art–nature relation.Camilla Flodin - 2018 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (1):176-196.
Adorno, Benjamin, and Natural Beauty on “This Sad Earth”.Jordan Daniels - 2020 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 34 (2):159-178.
Kant-Bibliographie 2002.Margit Ruffing - 2004 - Kant Studien 95 (4):505-538.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references