- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
What Can an Armchair Philosopher Do For a “Dirty-Hands” Engineer?
Axiomathes 22 (3):385-401 (2012)
Abstract
The paper relates the basic ontological categories defined by Roman Ingarden to an engineering model of function known by the name of Functional Basis. The intended aim of this exercise in applied philosophy is to make this model more consistent and outline some possible extensions thereofAuthor's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
What is an Artefact Design?Pawel Garbacz - 2009 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 13 (2):137-149.
Dirty Hands Make Dirty Leaders?! The Effects of Touching Dirty Objects on Rewarding Unethical Subordinates as a Function of a Leader's Self-Interest.Florien M. Cramwinckel, David Cremer & Marius Dijke - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 115 (1):93-100.
Dirty Hands and Loyalty in Organisational Politics.Chris Provis - 2005 - Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (2):283-298.
Democracy, Trust and the Problem of ‘Dirty Hands’.Stephen de Wijze - 2003 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (1):37-42.
The impossible project of love in Sartre's being and nothingness, dirty hands and the room.Jean Wyatt - 2006 - Sartre Studies International 12 (2):1-16.
Structure and Coherence of Two-Model-Descriptions of Technical Artefacts.Ulrich Krohs - 2009 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 13 (2):150-161.
Roman Ingarden. Ontology from a Phenomenological Point of View.Arkadiusz Chrudzimski - 2004 - Reports on Philosophy 22:121-142.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-01-01
Downloads
70 (#226,428)
6 months
1 (#1,478,435)
2011-01-01
Downloads
70 (#226,428)
6 months
1 (#1,478,435)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Engineering differences between natural, social, and artificial kinds.Eric T. Kerr - 2013 - In Maarten Franssen, Peter Kroes, Pieter Vermaas & Thomas A. C. Reydon (eds.), Artefact Kinds: Ontology and the Human-made World. Synthese Library.
References found in this work
Ingarden and the ontology of cultural objects.Amie Thomasson - 2005 - In Arkadiusz Chrudzimski (ed.), Existence, Culture, and Persons: The Ontology of Roman Ingarden. Frankfurt: pp. 115-136.
Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt, Band 1: Existentialontologie.Roman Ingarden - 1964 - De Gruyter.
Existence, culture, and persons: the ontology of Roman Ingarden.Arkadiusz Chrudzimski (ed.) - 2005 - Frankfurt: Ontos.
Roman Ingarden’s Ontology: Existential Dependence, Substances, Ideas, and Other Things Empiricists Do Not Like.Daniel von Wachter - 2005 - In A. Chrudzimski (ed.), Existence, Culture, and Persons: The Ontology of Roman Ingarden. Ontos Verlag. pp. 55-82.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-5tf24 uwo