The Tensors of the Averaged Relative Energy–Momentum and Angular Momentum in General Relativity and Some of Their Applications
Foundations of Physics 37 (3):341-365 (2007)
Abstract
There exist different kinds of averaging of the differences of the energy–momentum and angular momentum in normal coordinates NC(P) which give tensorial quantities. The obtained averaged quantities are equivalent mathematically because they differ only by constant scalar dimensional factors. One of these averaging was used in our papers [J. Garecki, Rep. Math. Phys. 33, 57 (1993); Int. J. Theor. Phys. 35, 2195 (1996); Rep. Math. Phys. 40, 485 (1997); J. Math. Phys. 40, 4035 (1999); Rep. Math. Phys. 43, 397 (1999); Rep. Math. Phys. 44, 95 (1999); Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 11, 441 (2002); M.P. Dabrowski and J. Garecki, Class. Quantum. Grar. 19, 1 (2002)] giving the canonical superenergy and angular supermomentum tensors. In this paper we present another averaging of the differences of the energy–momentum and angular momentum which gives tensorial quantities with proper dimensions of the energy–momentum and angular momentum densities. We have called these tensorial quantities “the averaged relative energy–momentum and angular momentum tensors”. These tensors are very closely related to the canonical superenergy and angular supermomentum tensors and they depend on some fundamental length L > 0. The averaged relative energy–momentum and angular momentum tensors of the gravitational field obtained in the paper can be applied, like the canonical superenergy and angular supermomentum tensors, to coordinate independent analysis (local and in special cases also global) of this field. Up to now we have applied the averaged relative energy–momentum tensors to analyze vacuum gravitational energy and momentum and to analyze energy and momentum of the Friedman (and also more general, only homogeneous) universes. The obtained results are interesting, e.g., the averaged relative energy density is positive definite for the all Friedman and other universes which have been considered in this paperDOI
10.1007/s10701-007-9107-y
My notes
Similar books and articles
Energy and Angular Momentum of Systems in General Relativity.F. I. Cooperstock - 2001 - Foundations of Physics 31 (7):1067-1082.
Quantum theory of single events: Localized De Broglie wavelets, Schrödinger waves, and classical trajectories. [REVIEW]A. O. Barut - 1990 - Foundations of Physics 20 (10):1233-1240.
Cross-Term Conservation Relationships for Electromagnetic Energy, Linear Momentum, and Angular Momentum.Daniel C. Cole - 1999 - Foundations of Physics 29 (11):1673-1693.
Closure Principles and the Laws of Conservation of Energy and Momentum.Sophie Gibb - 2010 - Dialectica 64 (3):363-384.
A multivector derivative approach to Lagrangian field theory.Anthony Lasenby, Chris Doran & Stephen Gull - 1993 - Foundations of Physics 23 (10):1295-1327.
Relativistic theory of gravitation.A. A. Logunov & M. A. Mestvirishvili - 1986 - Foundations of Physics 16 (1):1-26.
Bianchi identities and the automatic conservation of energy-momentum and angular momentum in general-relativistic field theories.Friedrich W. Hehl & J. Dermott McCrea - 1986 - Foundations of Physics 16 (3):267-293.
Energy localization in general relativity: A new hypothesis. [REVIEW]F. I. Cooperstock - 1992 - Foundations of Physics 22 (8):1011-1024.
A Relativistic Schrödinger-like Equation for a Photon and Its Second Quantization.Donald H. Kobe - 1999 - Foundations of Physics 29 (8):1203-1231.
Orbital and Field Angular Momentum in the Nucleon.D. Singleton & V. Dzhunushaliev - 2000 - Foundations of Physics 30 (7):1093-1105.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-22
Downloads
63 (#191,281)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
2013-11-22
Downloads
63 (#191,281)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
Historical graph of downloads