The Invisible Racialized Minority Entrepreneur: Using White Solipsism to Explain the White Space

Journal of Business Ethics 188 (3):397-418 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Few studies in the business ethics literature explore marginalized populations, such as the racially minoritized entrepreneur. This absence is an ethical issue for the business academy as it limits the advancement of racial epistemologies. This study explores how this exclusionary space emerges within the academy by identifying white solipsistic behavior, an ‘othering’ of minoritized populations. Using a multi-method approach, we find the business literature homogenizes the racially minoritized business owner regardless of race/ethnic origin and categorizes them as lacking in comparison to White entrepreneurs. A critical discourse analysis of university entrepreneurship website language and images reveals that the racially minoritized are presented as the outgroup. The language used to describe entrepreneurs was found to be predominantly agentic, building a hegemonic categorization of White men dominating entrepreneurship. Troublingly, but consistent with the literature review, when racialized minorities were present in images, we found them to be marginalized. Employing an experimental design to mock-up four websites featuring student entrepreneurs differing by race and gender, we ask ‘what if we make these under-represented entrepreneurs visible?’ Results show that women, and specifically racially minoritized women, have a greater impact on the entrepreneurial interests of university students compared to men. Overall, the results provide empirical evidence for white solipsism in the business academy. We call for self-reflexivity to transparentize the ‘invisible’ racially minoritized entrepreneur and fill the ‘white space’ by changing the framing and context of business research to be more inclusive.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

V Chemnitz East Forum 21–23 March 2001 "Human Resource Management in Transition".[author unknown] - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 26 (4):363-364.
Ethical Issues in Business: Perspectives from the Business Academic Community.[author unknown] - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 52 (2):141-141.
Erratum: Applying the Principles of Gestalt Theory to Teaching Ethics.[author unknown] - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (11):880-880.
Editorial: Purpose and Policy.Alex C. Michalos - 1982 - Journal of Business Ethics 1 (2):163-163.
Editorial: Purpose and Policy.Alex C. Michalos - 1982 - Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1):1-1.
Editorial: Conferences on Value Inquiry.James B. Wilbur - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (6):403-403.
Editorial: Purpose and Policy.Alex C. Michalos - 1982 - Journal of Business Ethics 1 (4):I-I.
Introduction.Hart Kevin & Hartman Geoffrey - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 51 (2):101-101.
Business and Society Review.[author unknown] - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 23 (4):429-429.
Call for papers.Michael-Owen Dr - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 64 (3):iii-iii.
Introduction.Darryl Reed & J. J. McMurtry - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 86 (Suppl 1):1-2.
Reviews. [REVIEW]Deborah C. Poff - 1983 - Journal of Business Ethics 2 (3):73-77.


Added to PP

15 (#952,403)

6 months
11 (#245,876)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?