Jorge García
Universidad de Cantabria
This paper examines the points of disagreement between Petrus Camper and J. W. von Goethe regarding the existence of the inter-maxillary bone in humans as the link between man and the rest of nature. This historical case illustrates the fundamental role of aesthetic judgements in scientific discovery. Thus, I shall show how the eighteenth century discovery of the inter-maxillary bone in humans was largely determined by aesthetic factors—specifically, those sets of assumptions and criteria implied in the aesthetic schemata of Camper and Goethe. I argue that the relevance of scientifically ascertainable morphological properties that count as evidence for the existence of bona fide anatomical structures depend on the aesthetic schema adopted by the communities assessing the classification. At the same time, I propose and explain mechanisms by which aesthetic considerations might determine the acceptability of empirical claims about the world. Based on the reconstruction of the arguments of Camper and Goethe, I conclude that aesthetic considerations play a substantive role in both the generation and preliminary evaluation of scientific hypotheses. This paper suggests a complementary relation between the mediation of aesthetic criteria in theory choice and in scientific discovery in that while aesthetic considerations in theory choice lead to conservatism; in the context of discovery they often lead to innovation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s40656-020-00325-y
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,410
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl Popper - 1959 - Studia Logica 9:262-265.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.K. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):55-57.

View all 50 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Computational Scientific Discovery.D. Sozou Peter, C. Lane Peter, Addis Mark & Gobet Fernand - 2017 - In Lorenzo Magnani & Tommaso Bertolotti (eds.), Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 719-734.
Scientific Discovery: That-What’s and What-That's.Samuel Schindler - 2015 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 2.
Herbert Simon's Computational Models of Scientific Discovery.Stephen Downes - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:97-108.
Explaining Scientific Discovery.Aleksandar Jokic - 1991 - Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara
Goethe and the Intermaxillary Bone.George A. Wells - 1967 - British Journal for the History of Science 3 (4):348-361.
But Bill . . . ?R. Melvin Keiser - 2009 - Tradition and Discovery 36 (2):43-49.
But Bill...?: Poteatian Meditations.R. Melvin Keiser - 2009 - Tradition and Discovery 36 (2):43-49.
Scientific Visualisations and Aesthetic Grounds for Trust.Annamaria Carusi - 2008 - Ethics and Information Technology 10 (4):243-254.


Added to PP index

Total views
8 ( #1,010,489 of 2,519,700 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,314 of 2,519,700 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes