Journal of Semantics 7 (4):379-393 (1990)
AbstractOne of the major tenets of the mental models theory of text comprehension is that the model of the text so far provides (part of) the context for understanding the current sentence. Using two sets of findings on the comprehension of anaphoric expressions, we attempt to provide a more specific interpretation for this statement. We first consider the linguistic distinction between deep and surface anaphors, and the proposal that they are interpreted with reference to mental models and to representations of surface form, respectively. Although the linguistic distinction is reflected fairly directly in considered judgements, in on-line processing both aspects of representation are implicated in the interpretation of both kinds of anaphora. The second set of findings shows that the interpretation of texts containing pronouns can be incomplete—only part of the information in the model is used to interpret the anaphor. Readers may effect mappings between role fillers in different clauses of a text or they may effect mappings between names and role fillers. We discuss evidence that these two types of mapping can be carried out separately and that, in certain circumstances, role-to-name mapping in particular may not take place at all.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Contextual Vocabulary Acquisition: From Algorithm to Curriculum.Michael W. Kibby & William J. Rapaport - 2014 - In Adriano Palma (ed.), Castañeda and His Guises: Essays on the Work of Hector-Neri Castañeda. De Gruyter. pp. 107-150.
In Defense of Contextual Vocabulary Acquisition: How to Do Things with Words in Context.William J. Rapaport - 2005 - In Anind Dey, Boicho Kokinov, David Leake & Roy Turner (eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context. Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 3554. pp. 396--409.
Computers Are Syntax All the Way Down: Reply to Bozşahin.William J. Rapaport - 2019 - Minds and Machines 29 (2):227-237.
Similar books and articles
Interpreting People and Interpreting Texts.William Child - 2006 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (3):423 – 441.
Asian Texts, Asian Contexts: Encounters with Asian Philosophies and Religions.David Edward Jones & Ellen R. Klein (eds.) - 2009 - State University of New York Press.
How the Construction of Mental Models Improves Learning.Monica Bucciarelli - 2007 - Mind and Society 6 (1):67-89.
Models in Science.Roman Frigg & Stephan Hartmann - 2006 - In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford.
Interpreting Anaphora Without Identifying Reference.George Yule - 1982 - Journal of Semantics 1 (3-4):315-322.
A Comparison of Different Cognitive Paradigms Using Simple Animats in a Virtual Laboratory, with Implications to the Notion of Cognition.Carlos Gershenson - 2002
Discussion de-Focusing on the Wason Selection Task: Mental Models or Mental Inference Rules? A Commentary on Green and Larking (1995).David K. Hardman - 1998 - Thinking and Reasoning 4 (1):83 – 94.
Induction: Representation, Strategy and Argument.David W. Green - 1994 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8 (1):45 – 50.
PDP Networks Can Provide Models That Are Not Mere Implementations of Classical Theories.Michael R. W. Dawson, David A. Medler & Istvan S. N. Berkeley - 1997 - Philosophical Psychology 10 (1):25-40.
Binding On the Fly: Cross-Sentential Anaphora in Variable— Free Semantics.Anna Szabolcsi - 2003 - In R. Oehrle & J. Kruijff (eds.), Resource Sensitivity, Binding, and Anaphora. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 215--227.