La Boétie and the Neo-Roman Conception of Freedom

History of European Ideas 39 (3):317-334 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Freedom as a natural right, the importance of consent, defending the idea that government should be in the hands of the most virtuous and reflective citizens, denouncing patronage, the need to link individual and political freedom ? These are some of the characteristics of La Boétie's doctrine that I believe place him within the tradition that Quentin Skinner calls the neo-Roman conception of civil liberty. Of course, La Boétie did not write a positive defence of the rule of law, as Livy did in his History of Rome and as the English republicans do, but the Discourse can easily be read as a legal plea condemning absolute monarchy and any kind of arbitrary regime

Similar books and articles

Freedom in the market.Philip Pettit - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):131-149.
Republican freedom and the rule of law.Christian List - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):201-220.
Athens and the spectrum of liberty.Matt Edge - 2009 - History of Political Thought 30 (1):1-45.
A Measure of Freedom.Ian Carter (ed.) - 1999 - Oxford University Press.
J.S. Mill's Conception Of Economic Freedom.B. Baum - 1999 - History of Political Thought 20 (3):494-530.
The Problem of freedom.Mary T. Clark (ed.) - 1973 - New York,: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Steiner’s Possession.Phil Hutchinson - 2004 - European Journal of Political Theory 3 (3):245-265.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
93 (#180,813)

6 months
79 (#54,332)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marta García-Alonso
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

Citations of this work

Reading Machiavelli and La Boétie with Lefort.Emmanuel Charreau - 2023 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 70 (174):82-105.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references