Foundations of Representation: Where Might Graphical Symbol Systems Come From?

Cognitive Science 31 (6):961-987 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It has been suggested that iconic graphical signs evolve into symbolic graphical signs through repeated usage. This article reports a series of interactive graphical communication experiments using a ‘pictionary’ task to establish the conditions under which the evolution might occur. Experiment 1 rules out a simple repetition based account in favor of an account that requires feedback and interaction between communicators. Experiment 2 shows how the degree of interaction affects the evolution of signs according to a process of grounding. Experiment 3 confirms the prediction that those not involved directly in the interaction have trouble interpreting the graphical signs produced in Experiment 1. On the basis of these results, this article argues that icons evolve into symbols as a consequence of the systematic shift in the locus of information from the sign to the users' memory of the sign's usage supported by an interactive grounding process.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Dynamic Perspective in Freeman’s Stakeholder Model.Yves Fassin - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):39-49.
Summary.D. J. Chalmers - 2013 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 28 (1):171-173.
In Defense of Praying with Images.Paul Moyaert - 2007 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (4):595-612.
Symbols and thought.Gary E. Schwartz - 1996 - Synthese 106 (3):399-407.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
43 (#351,093)

6 months
10 (#213,340)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?