Effect of presentation sequence, irrelevant dimensions, and instructional conditions upon the attainment of a meaningful restricted conjunctive concept

Journal of Experimental Psychology 92 (1):27 (1972)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0032166

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Relative difficulty of restricted-conjunctive and conjunctive concepts.P. L. Gardner - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (2):211.
Concept attainment as a function of instance contiguity and number of irrelevant dimensions.Roger L. Dominowski - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (3):573.
Effect of stimulus and instructional variables in an ambiguous concept-attainment task.Mary Janke - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (1):21.
Concept attainment: II. Effect of stimulus complexity upon concept attainment at two levels of intelligence.Sonia F. Osler & Grace E. Trautman - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (1):9.
Selection strategies in conjunctive, disjunctive, and biconditional concept attainment.Patrick R. Laughlin & Richard M. Jordan - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (2):188.
Relevant and irrelevant information in concept attainment.Joe L. Byers & Robert E. Davidson - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (2p1):277.
Use of negative instances in conjunctive concept identification.Irwin D. Nahinsky & Frank L. Slaymaker - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (1):64.
Rule and attribute identification in children's attainment of disjunctive and conjunctive concepts.Francis J. Di Vesta & Richard T. Walls - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (3p1):498.
Learner judgment in instructional decisions for learning meaningful paired associates.M. I. Woodson - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (1):167.
Trial-by-trial analysis of processes in simple and disjunctive concept-attainment tasks.Steven H. Schwartz - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (3):456.
Effects of some sequential manipulations of relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions on concept learning.Richard C. Anderson & John T. Guthrie - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (4):501.
Concept attainment as a function of motivation and task complexity.Patrick R. Laughlin, Richard E. Chenoweth, Barbara B. Farrell & Joseph E. McGrath - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 96 (1):54.
Some hypotheses about negative instances in single-attribute concept attainment.Stephen V. Heim & Ellin K. Scholnick - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (1):130.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
10 (#1,160,791)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references