Covering Public Officials: Gender and Privacy Issue Differences

Journal of Mass Media Ethics 15 (3):167-179 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article reports the results of two national studies of daily newspaper newsroom managers and their views about coverage of the private lives of politicians and political candidates. The data were collected in 1993 and 1999. The focus of this analysis is on differences between male and female newsroom managers. Studies in both years found some statistical differences between male and female editors, but on different variables from study to study. Overall results, however, found no broad support for the premise that gender shades news judgment on privacy-related matters. In the 1999 study, significant differences were found on issues related to candidate's extramarital affairs and sexual harassment, variables for which men and women arguably have different perspectives.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Real-Life Moral Judgment.Gillian R. Wark - 1996 - Dissertation, Simon Fraser University (Canada)

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
30 (#504,503)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Public Opinion About News Coverage of Leaders' Private Lives.Daniel Riffe - 2003 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 18 (2):98-110.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Journalists and the character of public officials/figures.Lee Wilkins - 1994 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 9 (3):157 – 168.
Beyond diversity: Expanding the canon in journalism ethics.Tom Brislin & Nancy Williams - 1996 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 11 (1):16 – 27.
Gatekeeping.Pamela Shoemaker - 1991 - SAGE Publications.

Add more references