Are There Foundations for Human Knowledge?

Behavior and Philosophy 19 (2):19 - 33 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Epistemology or the Theory of Knowledge has become one of the most complicated and esoteric areas of philosophy. This paper attempts to defend a form of foundationalism in epistemology which does not require the reader to be familiar with the philosophical literature; so, it should be of interest to psychologists concerned with the nature and character of human knowledge as well as, of course, to philosophers. The heart of the foundationalism defended here is the thesis that a belief is epistemically reliable unless it has been shown to be suspect.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Knowledge and evidence.Paul K. Moser - 1989 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The confusion over foundationalism.Jonathan L. Kvanvig - 1986 - Philosophia 16 (3-4):345-354.
Husserl, phenomenology, and foundationalism.Walter Hopp - 2008 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (2):194 – 216.
Knowledge in Perspective: Selected Essays in Epistemology.Ernest Sosa - 1991 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The structure of justification.Robert Audi - 1993 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Understanding human knowledge: philosophical essays.Barry Stroud - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Epistemology Without History is Blind.Philip Kitcher - 2011 - Erkenntnis 75 (3):505-524.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
38 (#397,063)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Coherence and the modularity of mind.Erik J. Olsson - 1997 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (3):404-11.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references