Against Organizational Functions

Philosophy of Science 84 (5):1093-1103 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Over the last 20 years, several philosophers have developed a new approach to biological functions, the organizational approach. This is not a single theory but a family of theories based on the idea that a trait token can acquire a function by virtue of the way it contributes to a complex, organized system and thereby to its own continued persistence as a token. I argue that the organizational approach faces a serious liberality objection. I examine three different ways organizational theorists have tried to avoid that objection and show how they fail.

Similar books and articles

Biological Organization and Cross-Generation Functions.Cristian Saborido, Matteo Mossio & Alvaro Moreno - 2011 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (3):583-606.
An organizational account of biological functions.Matteo Mossio, Cristian Saborido & Alvaro Moreno - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (4):813-841.
An Approach to Organizational Ethics.Josep M. Lozano - 2003 - Ethical Perspectives 10 (1):46-65.
Organizational Ethics of Chinese Mass Media.Yue Tan - 2012 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 27 (4):277-293.
Business Obligations for Human Rights.Michelle Westermann-Behaylo, Harry J. Van Buren Iii & Shawn L. Berman - 2011 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:189-201.
Biological pathology from an organizational perspective.Cristian Saborido & Alvaro Moreno - 2015 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 36 (1):83-95.
Interaction between communication and organizational conflict and its relationship with performance.Omid Mahdieh - 2015 - International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies 1 (2).


Added to PP

422 (#44,956)

6 months
107 (#36,019)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?