Philosophiques 39 (1):163-187 (2012)
Abstract |
Ce texte discute certaines conclusions d’un article récent de F. Mülhölzer et vise à montrer que le logicisme russellien a les moyens de résister à la critique que Wittgenstein lui adresse dans la partie III des Remarques sur les fondements desmathématiques.This paper discusses some conclusions of a recent article from F.Mülhölzer. It aims at showing that Russell’s logicism has the means to overcome the criticisms Wittgenstein expounded in Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, part III
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.7202/1011614ar |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Russell’s Hidden Substitutional Theory.Gregory Landini - 1998 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Philosophische Bemerkungen.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1971 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 161:253-254.
"A Mathematical Proof Must Be Surveyable" What Wittgenstein Meant by This and What It Implies.Felix Mühlhölzer - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 71 (1):57-86.
Wittgenstein's Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. [REVIEW]G. Kreisel - 1958 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9 (34):135-158.
View all 10 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-11-01
Total views
39 ( #293,099 of 2,519,632 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,756 of 2,519,632 )
2013-11-01
Total views
39 ( #293,099 of 2,519,632 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,756 of 2,519,632 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads