Health Care Analysis 9 (4):437-447 (2001)
AbstractScarce public resources require trade-offs between competing programs indifferent sectors, and the careful allocation of fixed resources within a single sector. This paper argues that a general quality of life instrument encompassing health-related and non-health-related components is suitable for determining the best trade-offs between sectors. Further, this paper suggests that subjective well-being shows the properties crucial to a general quality of life measure and has additional advantages that makes it particularly useful for the allocation of public and health care resources. The paper argues that Western societies are in an unusually prosperous situation today which allows to concentrate efforts not only on reducing harm but also on improving positive states of health. Further, subjective well-being can be evaluated from the patient's perspective and incorporates a valuation of life expectancy. Criteria required for an appropriate questionnaire that measures subjective well-being are presented.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Similar books and articles
Community, Public Health and Resource Allocation.T. M. Wilkinson - 2010 - Public Health Ethics 3 (3):267-271.
Impartiality and Disability Discrimination.Greg Bognar - 2011 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 21 (1):1-23.
'Playing God Because You Have To': Health Professionals' Narratives of Rationing Care in Humanitarian and Development Work.C. Sinding, L. Schwartz, M. Hunt, L. Redwood-Campbell, L. Elit & J. Ranford - 2010 - Public Health Ethics 3 (2):147-156.
Ethics, Prevention, and Public Health.Angus Dawson & Marcel Verweij (eds.) - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Well-Being and Fairness in the Distribution of Scarce Health Resources.Re'em Segev - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (3):231 – 260.
What Does Public Health Ethics Tell (Or Not Tell) Us About Intervening in Non-Communicable Diseases?Ross Upshur - 2013 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (1):19-28.
Allocating Scarce Resources in a Publicly Funded Health System: Ethical Considerations of a Canadian Managed Care Proposal.T. Reay - 1999 - Nursing Ethics 6 (3):240-249.
On the Possibility of a Positive-Sum Game in the Distribution of Health Care Resources.Joshua Cohen & Edwige Burg - 2003 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (3):327 – 338.
Implementing Public Health Regulations in Developing Countries: Lessons From the OECD Countries.Emily A. Mok, Lawrence O. Gostin, Monica Das Gupta & Max Levin - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (3):508-519.
Don’T Let the Bedbugs Bite: The Cimicidae Debacle and the Denial of Healthcare and Social Justice.Julie M. Aultman - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):417-427.
Allocating Health Care Resources. [REVIEW]Ida L. Baltikauskas - 1995 - Teaching Philosophy 18 (4):379-381.
Social Justice, Health Inequalities and Methodological Individualism in US Health Promotion.D. S. Goldberg - 2012 - Public Health Ethics 5 (2):104-115.
References found in this work
Quality of Life Measures in Health Care and Medical Ethics.Dan Brock - 2001 - In John Harris (ed.), Bioethics. Oxford University Press.
The Relation Between Concepts of Quality-of-Life, Health and Happiness.A. W. Musschenga - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (1):11-28.
Citations of this work
Utilitarian Theories Reconsidered: Common Misconceptions, More Recent Developments, and Health Policy Implications.Afschin Gandjour & Karl Wilhelm Lauterbach - 2003 - Health Care Analysis 11 (3):229-244.
A Fair Range of Choice: Justifying Maximum Patient Choice in the British National Health Service. [REVIEW]Stephen Wilmot - 2007 - Health Care Analysis 15 (2):59-72.