Is Subjective Well-being a Useful Parameter for Allocating Resources among Public Interventions?

Health Care Analysis 9 (4):437-447 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Scarce public resources require trade-offs between competing programs indifferent sectors, and the careful allocation of fixed resources within a single sector. This paper argues that a general quality of life instrument encompassing health-related and non-health-related components is suitable for determining the best trade-offs between sectors. Further, this paper suggests that subjective well-being shows the properties crucial to a general quality of life measure and has additional advantages that makes it particularly useful for the allocation of public and health care resources. The paper argues that Western societies are in an unusually prosperous situation today which allows to concentrate efforts not only on reducing harm but also on improving positive states of health. Further, subjective well-being can be evaluated from the patient's perspective and incorporates a valuation of life expectancy. Criteria required for an appropriate questionnaire that measures subjective well-being are presented.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,895

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The goals of health work: Quality of life, health and welfare. [REVIEW]Per-Anders Tengland - 2005 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 9 (2):155-167.
Well-being—more than health?Anna Hirsch - 2021 - Ethik in der Medizin 33 (1):71-88.
Public Health, Well-Being and Reciprocity.Bart Engelen - 2005 - Ethical Perspectives 12 (1):41-66.
Public Health, Well-Being and Reciprocity.Yvonne Denier - 2005 - Ethical Perspectives 12 (1):41-66.
Society's Allocation of Resources for Health.Daniel Wikler & Sarah Marchand - 1998 - In Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer, A Companion to Bioethics. Malden, Mass., USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 351–361.
Quality of life is a process not an outcome.Leah McClimans & John P. Browne - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (4):279-292.
Quality of Life and Value Assessment in Health Care.Alicia Hall - 2020 - Health Care Analysis 28 (1):45-61.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
47 (#567,382)

6 months
13 (#380,542)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?