Fine Tuning and the Varieties of Naturalism

Religious Studies 47 (1):59-71 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Naturalism has been characterized both as a claim about what exists and as a commitment to a certain methodology. The fine - tuning argument for God’s existence presents a significant challenge to each way of characterizing naturalism. The claim naturalist faces the fact that the best response to the fine - tuning argument requires the existence of many universes that are not clearly naturalistic themselves. Method naturalism faces the challenge that it does not have the resources to ground the preference of the many-world hypothesis to the designer hypothesis.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The fine-tuning argument.Neil A. Manson - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (1):271-286.
Astrophysical fine tuning, naturalism, and the contemporary design argument.Mark A. Walker & M. Milan - 2006 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (3):285 – 307.
Fine-tuning as evidence for a multiverse: why White is wrong. [REVIEW]Mark Douglas Saward - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (3):243-253.
Fine-Tuning, Multiple Universes, and the 'This Universe' Objection.Neil Manson - 2003 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (1):67 - 83.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-17

Downloads
61 (#253,934)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Charm of Naturalism.Barry Stroud - 1996 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 70 (2):43 - 55.
Free will and scientifiphicalism.Peter Unger - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (1):1-25.

Add more references