Contextually Incomplete Descriptions: A New Counterexample to Russell?

Analysis 55 (4):287 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/3328400

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Contextually Incomplete Descriptions: A New Counterexample to Russell?Jonardon Ganeri - 1995 - Analysis 55 (4):287 - 290.
Incomplete descriptions.Marga Reimer - 1992 - Erkenntnis 37 (3):347 - 363.
An abuse of context in semantics: The case of incomplete definite descriptions.Ernest Lepore - 2003
Incomplete Symbols — Definite Descriptions Revisited.Norbert Gratzl - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (5):489-506.
Russell on Incomplete Symbols.Bryan Pickel - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (10):909-923.
The paradoxes and Russell's theory of incomplete symbols.Kevin C. Klement - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 169 (2):183-207.
Why incomplete definite descriptions do not defeat Russell's theory of descriptions.Scott Soames - 2005 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 24 (3):7-30.
Essay fourteen. Why incomplete definite descriptions do not defeat russell’s theory of descriptions.Scott Soames - 2008 - In Philosophical Essays, Volume 1: Natural Language: What It Means and How We Use It. Princeton University Press. pp. 377-400.
Incomplete Descriptions, Incomplete Quantified Expressions (Part of the dissertation portfolio Modality, Names and Descriptions).Zsófia Zvolenszky - 2007 - Dissertation, New York University
Incomplete Descriptions and the Underdetermination Problem.Andrei Moldovan - 2015 - Research in Language 13 (4):352–367.
Has the problem of incompleteness rested on a mistake?Ray Buchanan & Gary Ostertag - 2005 - Mind 114 (456):889-913.
Urmson on Russell's Incomplete Symbols.R. K. Perkins - 1972 - Analysis 32 (6):200 - 203.
A Strawsonian Objection to Russell’s Theory of Descriptions.Murali Ramachandran - 1993 - Analysis 53 (4):209 - 212.
Russell was right (almost).Kent Bach - 1983 - Synthese 54 (2):189 - 207.
The Logical Form of Descriptions.Bernard Linsky - 1992 - Dialogue 31 (4):677-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-23

Downloads
20 (#716,889)

6 months
1 (#1,428,112)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonardon Ganeri
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

Descriptions and pressupositions: Strawson vs. Russell.Murali Ramachandran - 2008 - South African Journal of Philosophy 27 (3):242-257.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references