Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1:7-27 (2020)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
_Systematic public vaccination constitutes a tremendous health success, perhaps the greatest achievement of biomedicine so far. There is, however, room for improvement. Each year, 1.5 million deaths could be avoided with enhanced immunisation coverage. In recent years, many countries have introduced mandatory childhood vaccination programmes in an attempt to avoid deaths. In Norway, however, the vaccination programme has remained voluntary. Our childhood immunisation programme covers protection for twelve infectious diseases, and Norwegian children are systematically immunised from six weeks to sixteen years of age. In this article, we address the question of whether our country, Norway, should make the childhood vaccination programme mandatory. This question has received considerable public attention in the media, yet surprisingly little academic discussion has followed. The aim of the article is to systematically discuss whether it is morally justified to introduce a mandatory childhood vaccination programme in Norway. Our discussion proceeds as follows: We begin by presenting relevant background information on the history of vaccines and the current Norwegian childhood vaccination programme. Next, we discuss what we consider to be the most central arguments against mandatory childhood vaccination: the argument from the standpoints of parental rights, bodily integrity, naturalness, mistrust, and immunisation coverage. After that, we examine the central arguments in favour of mandatory childhood vaccination from the standpoints of harm, herd immunity, and as a precautionary strategy. We conclude that there are convincing moral arguments in favour of adopting a policy of mandatory childhood vaccination in Norway._ _Keywords_: autonomy, harm principle, herd immunity, parental rights, precautionary approach
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.5324/eip.v14i1.3316 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Parental Refusals of Medical Treatment: The Harm Principle as Threshold for State Intervention.Douglas Diekema - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):243-264.
A libertarian case for mandatory vaccination.J. Brennan - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics Recent Issues 44 (1):37-43.
Resisting Moral Permissiveness About Vaccine Refusal.Mark Navin - 2013 - Public Affairs Quarterly 27 (1):69-85.
View all 6 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Pandemics and Intergenerational Justice. Vaccination and the Wellbeing of Future Societies. FRFG Policy Paper.Jörg Tremmel - 2022 - Intergenerational Justice Review 7 (1).
Similar books and articles
Beneficence, Paternalism, and the Parental Prerogative – the Ethics of Mandatory Early Childhood Vaccination.Frej Thomsen - manuscript
Mandatory Vaccination: An Unqualified Defence.Roland Pierik - 2018 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 35 (2):381-398.
Japanese Childhood Vaccination Policy.Peter Doshi & Akira Akabayashi - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (3):283-289.
Childhood Immunisation, Vaccine Hesitancy, and Pro-Vaccination Policy in High-Income Countries.Frej Klem Thomsen - 2017 - Psychology, Public Policy and Law.
Raising Rates of Childhood Vaccination: The Trade-Off Between Coercion and Trust.Bridget Haire, Paul Komesaroff, Rose Leontini & C. Raina MacIntyre - 2018 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15 (2):199-209.
Libertarianism and Collective Action: Is There a Libertarian Case for Mandatory Vaccination?Charlie T. Blunden - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (1):71-74.
Mandating Vaccination: What Counts as a "Mandate" in Public Health and When Should They Be Used?Matthew K. Wynia - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (12):2 – 6.
A libertarian case for mandatory vaccination.J. Brennan - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics Recent Issues 44 (1):37-43.
A Libertarian Case for Mandatory Vaccination.Jason Brennan - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (1):37-43.
Should Childhood Immunisation Be Compulsory?P. Bradley - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (4):330-334.
Victims, Vectors and Villains: Are Those Who Opt Out of Vaccination Morally Responsible for the Deaths of Others?Euzebiusz Jamrozik, Toby Handfield & Michael J. Selgelid - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics (12):762-768.
Resisting Moral Permissiveness About Vaccine Refusal.Mark Navin - 2013 - Public Affairs Quarterly 27 (1):69-85.
Measles Vaccination is Best for Children: The Argument for Relying on Herd Immunity Fails.Johan Bester - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (3):375-384.
Measles Vaccination is Best for Children: The Argument for Relying on Herd Immunity Fails.Johan Bester - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (3):375-384.
The Ethics of Implementing Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in Developed Countries.Erik Malmqvist, Gert Helgesson, Johannes Lehtinen, Kari Natunen & Matti Lehtinen - 2011 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (1):19-27.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-03-05
Total views
15 ( #695,194 of 2,499,869 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #101,971 of 2,499,869 )
2020-03-05
Total views
15 ( #695,194 of 2,499,869 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #101,971 of 2,499,869 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads