The Sure Thing Principle Leads to Instability

Philosophical Quarterly (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Orthodox causal decision theory is unstable. Its advice changes as you make up your mind about what you will do. Several have objected to this kind of instability and explored stable alternatives. Here, I'll show that explorers in search of stability must part with a vestige of their homeland. There is no plausible stable decision theory which satisfies Savage's Sure Thing Principle. So those in search of stability must learn to live without it.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Sure-thing Principle and P2.Yang Liu - 2017 - Economics Letters 159:221-223.
Causal Decision Theory and Decision Instability.Brad Armendt - 2019 - Journal of Philosophy 116 (5):263-277.
It Can Be Irrational to Knowingly Choose the Best.J. Dmitri Gallow - forthcoming - Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
Costs of abandoning the Sure-Thing Principle.Rachael Briggs - 2015 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (5):827-840.
Rationality revisited.Reed Richter - 1984 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (4):392 – 403.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-30

Downloads
453 (#40,221)

6 months
165 (#16,547)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

J. Dmitri Gallow
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references