The Interpretation of Probability: Still an Open Issue? 1

Philosophies 2 (3):20 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Probability as understood today, namely as a quantitative notion expressible by means of a function ranging in the interval between 0–1, took shape in the mid-17th century, and presents both a mathematical and a philosophical aspect. Of these two sides, the second is by far the most controversial, and fuels a heated debate, still ongoing. After a short historical sketch of the birth and developments of probability, its major interpretations are outlined, by referring to the work of their most prominent representatives. The final section addresses the question of whether any of such interpretations can presently be considered predominant, which is answered in the negative.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Foundations of Probability.Rachael Briggs - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (6):625-640.
Interpretations of Probability.Weimin Sun - 2003 - Dissertation, The University of Connecticut
Philosophies of Probability: Objective Bayesianism and its Challenges.Jon Williamson - 2009 - In A. Irvine (ed.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Mathematics. Elsevier.
On qualitative axiomatizations for probability theory.Louis Narens - 1980 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 9 (2):143 - 151.
The Enigma Of Probability.Nick Ergodos - 2014 - Journal of Cognition and Neuroethics 2 (1):37-71.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-17

Downloads
24 (#642,030)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile