Replies to Barrett, Corris and Chemero, and Hutto

Philosophical Studies 176 (3):839-851 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this essay, I respond to the critical remarks of Louise Barrett, Amanda Corris and Anthony Chemero, and Daniel Hutto on my book Enactivist Interventions. In doing so, I consider whether behaviorism can make a contribution to enactivist theory, whether synergies are the same as dynamical gestalts, and whether the brain can add anything to mathematical reasoning.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Re-doing the math: making enactivism add up.Daniel D. Hutto - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (3):827-837.
The Value of Affordances.Luis H. Favela & Anthony Chemero - 2014 - Religion, Brain and Behavior 4:147-149.
“Strong” narrativity—a response to Hutto.Anthony Rudd - 2016 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15 (1):43-49.
Representation and dynamics.Keld Stehr Nielsen - 2010 - Philosophical Psychology 23 (6):759-773.
Enactivism, pragmatism…behaviorism?Louise Barrett - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (3):807-818.
Editorial note on the Colombo, Hutto, Myin exchange.Shaun Gallagher - 2014 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13 (2):239-240.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-01

Downloads
42 (#332,036)

6 months
3 (#445,838)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?