Judicial Decision and Practical Judgment [Book Review]

Journal of Philosophy 44 (2):51-52 (1947)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

0022362X

DOI

10.2307/2019427

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Does it really matter whether a judicial decision is morally legitimate? The practical implications of judicial illegitimacy in a[n] otherwise legitimate state.Kenneth E. Himma - 2007 - In José Rubio Carrecedo (ed.), Political philosophy: new proposals for new questions: proceedings of the 22nd IVR World Congress, Granada 2005, volume II = Filosofía política: nuevas propuestas para nuevas cuestiones. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
A Plea for Judgment.Michael Davis - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):789-808.
The form of practical knowledge: a study of the categorical imperative.Stephen P. Engstrom - 2009 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Virtuous Decision Making for Business Ethics.Chris Provis - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 91 (S1):3 - 16.
'Streamlining' the rule of law: How the department of justice is undermining judicial review of agency action.Shruti Rana - manuscript
The Unchangeable Judicial Formats.Paul Hoven - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (4):499-511.
The Unchangeable Judicial Formats.Paul van den Hoven - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (4):499-511.
A theory of practical reason.Robert Binkley - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (4):423-448.
Wasserstrom: The Judicial DecisionThe Judicial Decision. Richard A. Wasserstrom.Ronald Dworkin - 1964 - Ethics 75 (1):47-.
“What the patient would have decided”: A fundamental problem with the substituted judgment standard. [REVIEW]Linus Broström, Mats Johansson & Morten Klemme Nielsen - 2006 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (3):265-278.
The Collapsing Choice Theory: Dissociating Choice and Judgment in Decision Making. [REVIEW]Jeffrey M. Stibel, Itiel E. Dror & Talia Ben-Zeev - 2009 - Theory and Decision 66 (2):149-179.
Meaning and truth in judicial decision.Jerzy Wróblewski - 1979 - Helśinki: Juridica. Edited by Aulis Aarnio.
Empirical Fallacies in the Debate on Substituted Judgment.Mats Johansson & Linus Broström - 2012 - Health Care Analysis (1):1-9.
Judicial review: a practising judge's perspective.S. Breyer - 1999 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 19 (2):153-166.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
34 (#458,553)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references