Berkeley's master argument

Philosophical Review 83 (1):55-69 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In my article "berkeley's master argument" I attempt to show that an argument berkeley uses in the 'dialogues' and 'principles' to support his contention that whatever is perceivable is perceived can be seen as an illuminating attempt to relate conceptualizing, Imaging and perceiving. In consequence it cannot be dismissed as resting on an elementary fallacy, But reflects on the conditions for the self ascription of experience

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
741 (#22,871)

6 months
19 (#145,041)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

André Gallois
PhD: Oxford University; Last affiliation: Syracuse University

Citations of this work

Berkeley on Inconceivability and Impossibility.Thomas Holden - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 98 (1):107-122.
Imagining objects and imagining experiences.Paul Noordhof - 2002 - Mind and Language 17 (4):426-455.
Humean Idealism.Daniel Kodaj - 2023 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 101 (1):34-50.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references