A Pretabular Classical Relevance Logic

Studia Logica 100 (6):1211-1221 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we construct an extension, ℒ, of Anderson and Belnap's relevance logic R that is classical in the sense that it contains p&p → q as a theorem, and we prove that ℒ is pretabular in the sense that while it does not have a finite characteristic matrix, every proper normal extension of it does. We end the paper by commenting on the possibility of finding other classical relevance logics that are also pretabular

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pretabular varieties of modal algebras.W. J. Blok - 1980 - Studia Logica 39 (2-3):101 - 124.
Implicational f-structures and implicational relevance logics.A. Avron - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):788-802.
A new classical relevance logic.Garrel Pottinger - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):135 - 147.
Relevance, relatedness and restricted set theory.Barry Smith - 1991 - In Georg Schurz & Georg Jakob Wilhelm Dorn (eds.), Advances in Scientific Philosophy. Amsterdam: Rodopi. pp. 45-56.
Topical relevance in argumentation.Douglas N. Walton - 1982 - Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Relevant identity.Philip Kremer - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (2):199-222.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-10-20

Downloads
15 (#868,066)

6 months
5 (#441,012)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Extensions of the Lewis system S5.Schiller Joe Scroggs - 1951 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 16 (2):112-120.
3088 varieties a solution to the Ackermann constant problem.John K. Slaney - 1985 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (2):487-501.

Add more references