The Constitution of the Object in Immanuel Kant and John Poinsot

Review of Metaphysics 51 (1):55 - 75 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY, the advance of modern particle physics and the discovery of an inherent probabilism at the heart of the natural order has thrown scientific determinism into doubt. The central question that issues from such findings in physics is whether nature is inherently indeterminate or simply defectively known. If the answer is the former, then this development calls into question the central theoretical justification for the Kantian project. For although Kant makes rhetorical allusion to Nicholas Copernicus, his theory plainly stands in defense of Sir Isaac Newton’s classical mechanics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review: Lindsay, The Philosophy of Immanuel Kant. [REVIEW]Karin Costelloe - 1914 - International Journal of Ethics 24 (4):475-.
Kant’s Cosmopolitan Patriotism.Pauline Kleingeld - 2003 - Kant Studien 94 (3):299-316.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
23 (#658,616)

6 months
4 (#797,377)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?